不同意你的说法。 我一位亲戚当过陪审团的成员。我相信他是一个正经人。
他被选为陪审团成员的时候是NORTEL SR. PROGRAMMER AND WAS PAID BY NORTEL TO ATTEND. 他出席回来的当天晚上一进门口就对他的家人说别问他有关的结论，因为他已经宣誓对所有的过程进行保密。
-nark(nark);
2008-3-4(#4308318@0)
misleading... from thestar.com1, Crown prosecutor Joshua Levy conceded the case was circumstantial, with no independent eyewitness. But bruising on the back of the child's neck indicated she had been forcibly held under water.
2,Levy said Peng was also upset at a doctor's news, delivered hours earlier, that there would no surgical fix for her daughter's autism.
-oasis(oasis);
2008-3-4{337}(#4306645@0)
关于你这个肿块的说法我不太明白。我看到报道上说：在中国医生诊断脑积水，从而影响智力，认为到加拿大手术可以解决。在加拿大做CT表明并没有积水，从而LEUNG认为小孩是Autism，没有quick solution, 认为PENG夫妇听到这个消息后很失望，LEUNG认为这是所有父母的第一反应。你现在说二人听到消息后很高兴？
-canadiantire(轮胎 - Do It Now);
2008-3-4{30}(#4306973@0)
杀人的证据 --“But bruising on the back of the child's neck indicated she had been forcibly held under water.” 陈嘉嘉从小被送回国寄养， 后来被发现自闭症，和父母的感情不是那么亲。如果陈嘉嘉是彭璇亲自带大， 可能不会发生这样的事。 彭璇如果是无罪，只能有一个理由，当时精神不正常， 可并没有证据说明她精神不正常。相反地， 正常得把故事说得“合情合理”。
-serveok_3.0(OKserve);
2008-3-4{102}(#4307158@0)
not really! In Canada, Second degree murder is killing that is done with malice, but not planned and deliberated. Why a mother bear her sick baby with malice?
-adamandeve(拿喇叭打蛤蟆哑巴喇嘛);
2008-3-4(#4306810@0)
There is a missconception of those guys who blindly believed the Jury's conclusion.There is a missconception of those guys who blindly believed the Jury's conclusion. There are so many real-life tv on mis judgement of child murder cases similar to this case. Many parents or innocent people are sentenced for long prison time for false allegation. Those guys even claimed no or almost no innocent people will be charged in western society. those guys are either naive or silly to get such conclusion.
-friendforever(nice);
2008-3-6{418}(#4312094@0)